With the conclusion of the 7th round of ACTA negotiations in Guadalajara, Mexico last week, participating countries issued the
now-standard boilerplate statement that merely repeats the agenda items and provides no real insight into the progress of the talks. While the statement is does little to advance the desire for greater transparency, reports from
New Zealand and
Sweden shed far more light on where things stand. The key points:
- The U.S. proposal for Internet enforcement has received considerable public attention, yet there are three proposals on the table that address digital enforcement and safe harbours (ie. intermediary liability). One of New Zealand's negotiators reports that a fourth proposal is currently being formulated and that it could take six more months before this chapter is settled.
- In addition to safe harbour rules, the talks in Mexico also addressed DMCA-style issues such as anti-circumvention legislation.
- The Europeans continue to push for the extension of ACTA beyond copyright and trademarks to also include patents.
- Some countries have become more open to sharing ACTA documents in response to transparency concerns, but there remain some who insist that the discussions remain strictly confidential. Both New Zealand and Sweden are on record as supporting greater transparency.
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010 at 10:13 am and is filed under CyberLaw, copyright.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.