<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LibertyVoice &#187; CyberLaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertyvoice.net/category/cyberlaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net</link>
	<description>Freedom and internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>United States v. Megaupload Limited</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/united-states-v-megaupload-limited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/united-states-v-megaupload-limited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CMLP Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=8daae7b7cd34a2dfe48914e3d426e6e1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
     
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/united-states-v-megaupload-limited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>See No Evil: Study Says Judges Don&#8217;t Find Jurors Using Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/see-no-evil-study-says-judges-dont-find-jurors-using-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/see-no-evil-study-says-judges-dont-find-jurors-using-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric P. Robinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=0ab65eb70bddfaf010174bd9062798be</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Federal Judicial Center
has released a study which
concludes that &#34;detected social media use by jurors is 
infrequent, and that most judges have taken steps to ensure jurors do 
not use social media in the courtroom,&#34; and implies that ju...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/see-no-evil-study-says-judges-dont-find-jurors-using-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New game for social media in Olympics</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/new-game-for-social-media-in-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/new-game-for-social-media-in-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the London Free Press &#8211; February 6, 2012 &#8211; Read this on Canoe LONDON SUMMER OLYMPICS: New restrictions being implemented, but how the policies are enforced raises many unanswered questions The 70,000 volunteers for the 2012 London Summer Olympics will have to think twice about what they upload to Facebook, tweet or blog. They [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/new-game-for-social-media-in-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Won&#8217;t Somebody Please Think of the Children?: A Few Modest Thoughts on Mass. Senate Bill No. 785</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children-a-few-modest-thoughts-on-mass-senate-bill-no-785/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children-a-few-modest-thoughts-on-mass-senate-bill-no-785/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey P. Hermes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prior Restraints]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=5cb35580839b7fec64f32b7c35c34935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 7, 2012, the Joint Committee on the Judiciary of the Massachusetts Legislature will hold a hearing on Massachusetts Senate Bill No. 785, entitled &#34;An Act relative to the protection of child witnesses.&#34;  The bill would, among other...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children-a-few-modest-thoughts-on-mass-senate-bill-no-785/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six interesting technology law issues raised in the Facebook IPO</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/six-interesting-technology-law-issues-raised-in-the-facebook-ipo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/six-interesting-technology-law-issues-raised-in-the-facebook-ipo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan Brown (@internetcases)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonpracticing entities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right of Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 230]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=2815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent trolls, open source, do not track, SOPA, PIPA and much, much more: Facebook&#8217;s IPO filing has a real zoo of issues. The securities laws require that companies going public identify risk factors that could adversely affect the company&#8217;s stock. Facebook&#8217;s S-1 filing, which it sent to the SEC today, identified almost 40 such factors. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/six-interesting-technology-law-issues-raised-in-the-facebook-ipo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Commissioner explains problems with proposed lawful access law</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/privacy-commissioner-explains-problems-with-proposed-lawful-access-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/privacy-commissioner-explains-problems-with-proposed-lawful-access-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the title of my Slaw post for today.  It reads as follows. With Parliament back in session, we are seeing more attention on the proposed &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation. There is good reason for that. Many of us believe the proposed legislation is an affront to privacy, and gives law enforcement overly intrusive rights without [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/privacy-commissioner-explains-problems-with-proposed-lawful-access-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the radio: Mobile devices and the Fourth Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/on-the-radio-mobile-devices-and-the-fourth-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/on-the-radio-mobile-devices-and-the-fourth-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan Brown (@internetcases)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=2806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was honored to be a guest on this morning&#8217;s episode of Oregon Public Broadcasting&#8217;s show Listen Out Loud, talking with host Dave Miller about the recent case of Schlossberg v. Solesbee. Listen to the interview here: MP3 We talked about the Fourth Amendment and, more specifically, the exceptions to the warrant requirement for searches [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/on-the-radio-mobile-devices-and-the-fourth-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.internetcases.com/mp3/2012-01-31_oregon_public_radio.mp3" length="47757008" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fair use, the DMCA, and presidential politics</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/fair-use-the-dmca-and-presidential-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/fair-use-the-dmca-and-presidential-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan Brown (@internetcases)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=2792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2012 presidential election cycle is already giving internet law enthusiasts things to talk about. Last week it was Ron Paul&#8217;s grumblings about an unauthorized campaign ad on YouTube. Now NBC is moaning about a Mitt Romney ad comprised almost entirely of Tom Brokaw on the Nightly News in 1997. NBC has asked the ad [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/fair-use-the-dmca-and-presidential-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Twitter&#8217;s New Censorship Tool Isn&#8217;t As Bad As It Seems</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/why-twitters-new-censorship-tool-isnt-as-bad-as-it-seems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/why-twitters-new-censorship-tool-isnt-as-bad-as-it-seems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Bright</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=c67b4d831d5ca32ed0a91f4283b58757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Last Thursday, Twitter announced that it would start censoring tweets by denying access to specific tweets in countries where those tweets would be illegal.  Naturally, this has caused a lot of concern online.  


Some see the announcement as a firs...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/why-twitters-new-censorship-tool-isnt-as-bad-as-it-seems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are nonpirate Megaupload users entitled to compensation from the government?</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/are-nonpirate-megaupload-users-entitled-to-compensation-from-the-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/are-nonpirate-megaupload-users-entitled-to-compensation-from-the-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Evan Brown (@internetcases)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fifth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MegaUpload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takings clause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetcases.com/?p=2775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I left my coat in a taxi that was later impounded because, unknown to me, the driver was transporting heroin in the trunk, would I be left out in the cold? People who used Megaupload to lawfully store and transfer files are rightfully upset that their stuff is unavailable after last week&#8217;s raid. Some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/are-nonpirate-megaupload-users-entitled-to-compensation-from-the-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

