<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LibertyVoice &#187; Free speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertyvoice.net/category/free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net</link>
	<description>Freedom and internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PlayStation 3 &quot;Other OS&quot; Saga Shows: Jailbreaking Is Not a Crime</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/playstation-3-other-os-saga-shows-jailbreaking-is-not-a-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/playstation-3-other-os-saga-shows-jailbreaking-is-not-a-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>parker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=f5318d84f108ab98d5848939626a92e7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div><div><div><p>Every three years, the Copyright Office reviews requests for exemptions to the "anti-circumvention" rules in the DMCA. EFF has successfully lobbied for a number of exemptions in the past, and we're working to <a href="https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-seeks-widen-exemptions-won-last-dmca-rulemaking">renew and expand those exemptions now</a>. You can get behind our efforts by signing on today to letters of support: the filmmaker Kirby Ferguson is telling the Copyright Office why <a href="https://ripmixmake.org">video ripping is so important to filmmakers and video artists</a>, and the game system hacker bunnie Huang is addressing why <a href="https://jailbreakingisnotacrime.org">we need to keep jailbreaking legal for all devices</a>.</p>
<p>If you still aren't sure why jailbreaking is important, one prime example of the problem is the Sony PlayStation 3. That game system initially shipped with the ability to install Linux and other Unix derivatives. As a result, not only did hobbyists use PS3s as homebrew computers, but Unix-based PS3s were also linked in labs to make <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/25/condor-supercomputer-made-of-1716-ps3s-now-online/">affordable supercomputers</a>.</p>
<p>However, in April 2010, Sony’s mandatory firmware update -- version 3.21 -- removed the ability to install "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3#OtherOS_support">Other OS</a>" -- meaning no more Linux on your PlayStation. To add legal muscle to its firmware, <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/sony-v-hotz-sony-sends-dangerous-message">Sony sued several security researchers</a> for publishing information about security holes that would allow users to run Linux on their machines again. Claiming that the research violated the DMCA, Sony asked the court to impound all "circumvention devices" -- which it defines to include not only the defendants' computers, but also all "instructions," i.e., their research and findings.</p>
<p>This means you can set your PlayStation on fire, but you can’t run Linux on hardware you own. To illustrate how ludicrous this is, we made a video illustrating what an owner can do with a PlayStation -- and what Sony contends they can’t.</p>
<p><div><div><img width="400" height="250" class="mytubethumb" src="https://www.eff.org/sites/default/files/mytube/yt_hs4_6-qmh6U.jpg" alt="mytubethumb" /><img src="https://www.eff.org/sites/all/modules/mytube/play.png" class="mytubeplay" alt="play" /></div><!--mytubetrigger--><div><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/02/embedded-video-and-your-privacy">Privacy info.</a> This embed will serve content from <em><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/embed/hs4_6-qmh6U?rel=1&#38;autoplay=1">youtube.com</a></em><br /></div></div></p>
<p>Help us legalize Linux on the PS3, and protect innovative uses of personal devices by <a href="https://jailbreakingisnotacrime.org">signing on to bunnie's letter to the Copyright Office</a> or by <a href="https://www.eff.org/pages/jailbreaking-not-crime-tell-copyright-office-free-your-devices">submitting your own comment today</a>.</p>

</div></div></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/playstation-3-other-os-saga-shows-jailbreaking-is-not-a-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Face of Exclusion and the Racial Justice Act</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/the-face-of-exclusion-and-the-racial-justice-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/the-face-of-exclusion-and-the-racial-justice-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denny LeBoeuf, Capital Punishment Project</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcus Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racial Justice Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=76c67cdeee983efcf0720f5923d60c84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a simple assumption at the heart of North  Carolina&#8217;s Racial Justice Act (RJA), which allows death row inmates to  present statistical evidence to support the contention that race discrimination  played a part in their case and poss...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/the-face-of-exclusion-and-the-racial-justice-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU&#8217;s Laura Murphy on the &quot;Today&quot; Show Tuesday Morning</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/aclus-laura-murphy-on-the-today-show-tuesday-morning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/aclus-laura-murphy-on-the-today-show-tuesday-morning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alicia Gay, ACLU</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brith control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=0ec69539856d669219e20c3906920432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Tomorrow morning Laura Murphy, Director of  our Washington Legislative Office, will appear on NBC&#8217;s &#8220;Today&#8221; to discuss the  recent controversy surrounding the Obama administration&#8217;s announcement that  it would keep in place a p...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/aclus-laura-murphy-on-the-today-show-tuesday-morning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>United States v. Megaupload Limited</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/united-states-v-megaupload-limited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/united-states-v-megaupload-limited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CMLP Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=8daae7b7cd34a2dfe48914e3d426e6e1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
     
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/united-states-v-megaupload-limited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Under the Radar: South Carolina Rushes Through Yet another Voter Suppression Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/under-the-radar-south-carolina-rushes-through-yet-another-voter-suppression-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/under-the-radar-south-carolina-rushes-through-yet-another-voter-suppression-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie O’Connor, Voting Rights Project</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=bea424eb1e185b1a3d412bf2b2a8f534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The  dust has barely settled in South Carolina since the  Department of Justice refused to approve the state&#8217;s voter ID law, a  discriminatory measure which would disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters,  many of them African-American, elderl...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/under-the-radar-south-carolina-rushes-through-yet-another-voter-suppression-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Trying to Fast-Track Domestic Drone Use, Sideline Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/congress-trying-to-fast-track-domestic-drone-use-sideline-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/congress-trying-to-fast-track-domestic-drone-use-sideline-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jay Stanley, Speech, Privacy and Technology Project</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=2ed3151a0704d9d26c5287b2fe29363d</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress is poised to give final passage to legislation that  would give a big boost to domestic unmanned aerial surveillance &#8212; aka &#8220;drones.&#8221;
As we explained in our recent report,  drone technology is advancing by leaps and bounds, an...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/congress-trying-to-fast-track-domestic-drone-use-sideline-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>See No Evil: Study Says Judges Don&#8217;t Find Jurors Using Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/see-no-evil-study-says-judges-dont-find-jurors-using-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/see-no-evil-study-says-judges-dont-find-jurors-using-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric P. Robinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access to Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=0ab65eb70bddfaf010174bd9062798be</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Federal Judicial Center
has released a study which
concludes that &#34;detected social media use by jurors is 
infrequent, and that most judges have taken steps to ensure jurors do 
not use social media in the courtroom,&#34; and implies that ju...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/see-no-evil-study-says-judges-dont-find-jurors-using-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Agenda: Week of February 6 – 10, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/on-the-agenda-week-of-february-6-%e2%80%93-10-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/on-the-agenda-week-of-february-6-%e2%80%93-10-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Ito, ACLU</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=be51aa815e7599eac51dff2dbb212828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The  first hearing under North Carolina's Racial Justice Act continues this week.  The ACLU is part of a team of lawyers representing Marcus  Robinson, a black defendant convicted in the death of a white person and who  received a far harsher judgment ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/on-the-agenda-week-of-february-6-%e2%80%93-10-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week in Civil Liberties (2/3/2012)</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/this-week-in-civil-liberties-232012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/this-week-in-civil-liberties-232012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rekha Arulanantham, ACLU</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=a5569a5ceda3f6fa6244e2c584282589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we  sued the government for information on what program?
Why was ACLU of  Ohio client Zach bullied and beaten in school?
Which movie  rental company will be able to share your video rental records perpetually if  H.R. 2471 is passed?
Which go...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/this-week-in-civil-liberties-232012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Threat to Current Sentencing Law Looms: Are We Headed Back to Mandatory Guidelines?</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/threat-to-current-sentencing-law-looms-are-we-headed-back-to-mandatory-guidelines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/threat-to-current-sentencing-law-looms-are-we-headed-back-to-mandatory-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandhya Bathija, Washington Legislative Office</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug sentencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Sentencing Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentencing disparity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Sentencing Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertyvoice.net/?guid=5dece4848f8d624fd33cff90f3c48cb1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate over sentencing guidelines is about to heat up in Congress,  according to a recent report by NPR. In a story that ran on Tuesday&#8217;s Morning  Edition, Carrie Johnson reports that some GOP members of Congress aren&#8217;t  happy with the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/threat-to-current-sentencing-law-looms-are-we-headed-back-to-mandatory-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

