- Wednesday, May 22, 2013, 22:21
- Free speech
Yesterday, the Texas House of Representatives passed the
first bill in the nation that would require law enforcement to obtain a
probable cause warrant before tracking individuals’ location by collecting their
cell phone location data. As Rebecca Robertson, legal and policy director for the ACLU of Texas
put it, “By approving this amendment, our legislators would take a significant step to ...
Full story
- Monday, May 20, 2013, 17:36
- Free speech
Last week we
learned that the Department of Justice, in an unprecedented intrusion on the work of journalists
, had obtained records for twenty telephone numbers belonging to the Associated Press or its reporters, spanning April and May 2012. The telephone records obtained do not include the content of phone calls, but they likely reveal the phone number of each and every caller on ...
Full story
- Monday, May 20, 2013, 15:00
- Free speech
Representatives of the drone industry and other drone boosters often make a point of saying they don’t like to use the word “drones.” When my colleague Catherine Crump and I were writing our drones
report in 2011, we talked over what terminology we should use, and decided that since our job was to communicate, we should use the term that people would most clearly ...
Full story
- Friday, May 17, 2013, 19:36
- Free speech
On May 8, the ACLU
released a slew of government documents obtained from the FBI, U.S. Attorneys' offices around the country, and the Justice Department's Criminal Division concerning the government's access to the contents of private electronic communications. The
media has seized upon one of those documents, an undated memo titled,
"Guidance for the Minimization of Text Messages over ...
Full story
- Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 17:27
- Free speech
A federal magistrate judge in New York recently ruled that cell phone location data deserves no protection under the Fourth Amendment and that accordingly, the government can engage in real-time location surveillance without a search warrant. In an opinion straight from the Twilight Zone, magistrate judge Gary Brown ruled two weeks ago that “cell phone users who fail to turn off their cell phones do ...
Full story
- Monday, May 13, 2013, 17:39
- Free speech
Former Senator Joseph Lieberman recently
charged that mistakes by U.S. security agencies were responsible for failing to stop the Boston Marathon bombing. I recently
wrote about how mass surveillance makes this kind of recrimination inevitable, because once a government agency spies on a person, they become in a sense responsible for any actions that that person takes. To paraphrase
Colin Powell, we ...
Full story
- Thursday, May 9, 2013, 18:58
- Free speech
A few years ago, one of our ACLU state affiliates received a request for help from a man who had set up a marijuana grow operation in his home. He was apparently quite proud of what he built, because he bragged about it not only to his friends, but also to his Facebook “Friends.” Unfortunately, one of his Friends was Friends with a police officer ...
Full story
- Thursday, May 9, 2013, 18:58
- Free speech
A few years ago, one of our ACLU state affiliates received a request for help from a man who had set up a marijuana grow operation in his home. He was apparently quite proud of what he built, because he bragged about it not only to his friends, but also to his Facebook “Friends.” Unfortunately, one of his Friends was Friends with a police officer ...
Full story
- Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 23:09
- Free speech
Today, a federal district judge in Arizona issued a very disappointing decision concerning the government’s obligations to be candid with courts about new technologies they are seeking a warrant to use.
The case involves Daniel Rigmaiden, who is being criminally prosecuted for an alleged electronic tax fraud scheme. The government used a surveillance device known as a stingray to locate Mr. Rigmaiden. A stingray operates by ...
Full story
- Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 23:09
- Free speech
Today, a federal district judge in Arizona issued a very disappointing decision concerning the government’s obligations to be candid with courts about new technologies they are seeking a warrant to use.
The case involves Daniel Rigmaiden, who is being criminally prosecuted for an alleged electronic tax fraud scheme. The government used a surveillance device known as a stingray to locate Mr. Rigmaiden. A stingray operates by ...
Full story