<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LibertyVoice &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertyvoice.net/tag/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net</link>
	<description>Freedom and internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New game for social media in Olympics</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/new-game-for-social-media-in-olympics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/new-game-for-social-media-in-olympics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the London Free Press &#8211; February 6, 2012 &#8211; Read this on Canoe LONDON SUMMER OLYMPICS: New restrictions being implemented, but how the policies are enforced raises many unanswered questions The 70,000 volunteers for the 2012 London Summer Olympics will have to think twice about what they upload to Facebook, tweet or blog. They [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/new-game-for-social-media-in-olympics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Commissioner explains problems with proposed lawful access law</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/privacy-commissioner-explains-problems-with-proposed-lawful-access-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/privacy-commissioner-explains-problems-with-proposed-lawful-access-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the title of my Slaw post for today.  It reads as follows. With Parliament back in session, we are seeing more attention on the proposed &#8220;lawful access&#8221; legislation. There is good reason for that. Many of us believe the proposed legislation is an affront to privacy, and gives law enforcement overly intrusive rights without [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-02/privacy-commissioner-explains-problems-with-proposed-lawful-access-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Data Privacy Day</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/happy-data-privacy-day-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/happy-data-privacy-day-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
For more details see the Privacy Commissioner&#8217;s website.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/happy-data-privacy-day-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy – 1 step forward, 1 step back</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/privacy-%e2%80%93-1-step-forward-1-step-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/privacy-%e2%80%93-1-step-forward-1-step-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the title of my Slaw post for today.  It reads as follows. Getting the privacy balance right is not easy, from both theoretical and practical perspectives. As examples, here are some recent developments that go both ways. Pro Privacy Proposed Bill C-12 amendments to PIPEDA that would mandate privacy breach notification in certain circumstances. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/privacy-%e2%80%93-1-step-forward-1-step-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report on privacy tackles airport security</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/report-on-privacy-tackles-airport-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/report-on-privacy-tackles-airport-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the London Free Press &#8211; January 23, 2012 &#8211; Read this on Canoe The Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) recently tabled its Annual Report on the Privacy Act. The airport scanner issue receiving much of the press, however there are a number of other noteworthy items in the report. The Privacy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/report-on-privacy-tackles-airport-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You can now be sued for invasion of privacy in Ontario</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/you-can-now-be-sued-for-invasion-of-privacy-in-ontario/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/you-can-now-be-sued-for-invasion-of-privacy-in-ontario/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intrusion upon seclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ontario Court of Appeal just released its decision in Jones v Tsige saying that there is a tort of invasion of privacy in Ontario.  Until this decision, it was generally felt that this right did not exist in Ontario.  The court also refers to the tort as intrusion upon seclusion. The gist of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/you-can-now-be-sued-for-invasion-of-privacy-in-ontario/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop SOPA – PIPA protest</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/stop-sopa-%e2%80%93-pipa-protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/stop-sopa-%e2%80%93-pipa-protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the title of my Slaw post for today.  It reads as follows. Here are some of the sites that are going dark today, or changing their home pages in protest over the proposed US legislation. For more information on why this legislation is so bad, check out these sites, or search for &#8220;SOPA&#8221; on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/stop-sopa-%e2%80%93-pipa-protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CES and privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/ces-and-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/ces-and-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the title of my Slaw post for today.  It reads as follows. As Connie mentioned, the annual Consumer Electronics Show is now underway in Las Vegas. The tech press is full of commentary on the latest and greatest things at the show. One trend is that everything is becoming more intelligent and more connected, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/ces-and-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Expect focus on virtual wallets in 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/expect-focus-on-virtual-wallets-in-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/expect-focus-on-virtual-wallets-in-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital wallets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet of things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the London Free Press &#8211; January 9, 2012 &#8211; Read this on Canoe Here are some tech developments to look out for in 2012. The proposed amendments to Pipeda, the Canadian federal-privacy legislation, will be passed. Several of the amendments are long overdue, and will give some practical relief to business, without any compromise [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/expect-focus-on-virtual-wallets-in-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-spam law musings</title>
		<link>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/anti-spam-law-musings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/anti-spam-law-musings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CyberLaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-spam bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://canton.elegal.ca/?p=2756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the title of my Slaw post for today.  It reads as follows: Pending legislation always makes good fodder for lawyers to comment on in annual predictions articles. The pending anti-spam legislation has resulted in several such comments. In my predictions article scheduled for publication next week, I comment that: The Federal anti-spam legislation that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.libertyvoice.net/2012-01/anti-spam-law-musings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

